The Boundaries of Theatre

Many of you may have heard of the anger towards Sia and her new movie, or James Corden and his stereotypical acting in The Prom. Due to this, I am going to be discussing the boundaries of theatre and how far people should go when portraying other people or characters, whether that character or actor be part of the LGBTQ+ community or have some form of disability.

When asked ‘should straight people be able to play people/characters who are part of the LGBTQ+ community?’, 72.1% of people asked suggested that they should be able to. One opinion on this was “a straight actor playing a gay person is ok with me, but I am not the main voice which should be heard as I am not gay, and others should be heard before me.”

I personally feel that it is a different case when you are looking at people who are physically disabled versus people who are mentally disabled. It is quite a difficult decision to make and I feel it is situational. Say the character becomes a wheelchair user throughout the course of the play or film, it becomes much more difficult to cast a disabled person as you need someone who is able bodied for part of the play. However, I do not feel that it is right for someone who isn’t mentally disabled to play someone who is if there is someone who is mentally disabled who is capable of playing the role as you do not understand what someone with that condition experiences. If there is not someone who is capable of playing the role, then I feel it is ok to have someone play the character as long as they have thoroughly researched the role and none of their acting is stereotypical or offensive.

When asked about the above, someone said, “I think if people have done the research and understand what it’s like to live with all of the above, then maybe it’s ok, but when there’s so many able people from the categories to play the parts, it’s ridiculous and pretty offensive to choose someone else.”

 

Touring Woes for Musicians

In the UK-EU Brexit deal, there is a gaping hole where the promised free movement of musicians should be. According to research from the Association of British Orchestras (ABO), British musicians will only be able to perform in EU countries for up to 90 days within 180 days. They may also need a work permit to do so, rules for which are set by each member state. This means musicians could be required to have multiple visas or work permits to be able to perform in different countries across the EU. This will become too expensive and potentially prohibitive, especially for musicians at the start of their careers.

Some of the UK’s biggest music stars have written to the government demanding action to ensure visa-free touring in the European Union. Sir Elton John and Liam Gallagher are among 110 artists who have signed an open letter.

The Musicians’ Union has been lobbying for the creation of a “musicians’ passport” that would last at least two years, cost nothing or very little, encompass all EU member states, prevent any requirement for carnets or other permits, and cover road crew, technicians, and other necessary staff to facilitate touring. A change.org petition supporting this idea has reached 113,500 signatures.

I believe it is unacceptable that musicians are expected to potentially have to pay for multiple visas just to tour Europe. This will make it impossible for some to tour and will put off others from starting their careers in the first place.

The Emerging Mental Health Crisis

Mental health and the help that people with mental health problems receive is an important topic in the UK. However, this problem has become much more prominent over the course of the coronavirus crisis. There is increasingly deteriorating mental health in this country with a significant lack of support. This needs changing.

Coronavirus lockdowns have led to worsening mental health and many people are struggling to cope. In the last lockdown a study found that suicidal thoughts have increased from 8% to 10% and they were highest among young adults (18-29 years), rising from 12.5% to 14%. One in four respondents experienced at least moderate levels of depressive symptoms. Young people, women, individuals from more socially-disadvantaged backgrounds and those with pre-existing mental health problems reported the worst mental health problems in the initial phase of the national lockdown. You can find out more information about this here: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-54616688

Coronavirus is affecting student mental health in so many different ways. Mind’s coronavirus survey results revealed the following: people aged 18-24 reported worse mental health and wellbeing during the 2020 UK lockdown with nearly three quarters (73%) of students saying that their mental health declined during the lockdown. This number is only going to increase during the lockdown the UK is now facing this January and beyond. You can find out more at https://www.mind.org.uk/information-support/coronavirus/student-mental-health-during-coronavirus/

Despite the NHS website stating that, “We aim to transform mental health services by 2020, with an ambition of putting mental health on an equal footing to physical health,” this has not happened and mental health is still not equal to physical health, with there being long waiting lists and not enough beds, meaning people are not getting the help that they require soon enough and this can sometimes be too late.

We need to solve this mental health crisis and allow people to be able to access the help they need.

Rating Christmas Songs

Best

1. All I want for Christmas is you. It puts people into a festive mood straight away.

2. Band Aid. Everyone knows the song and so it is a bop at a party.

3. Last Christmas. The film boosted the song up the charts again in 2019.

4. I wish it could be Christmas everyday. A real party song!

5. Merry Xmas everyone. It has been Christmas number one before.

Worst

1. Santa Baby. “It’s very strange” – Imogen B.

2. Santa Claus is coming to town. “Creepy as he watches you” – Imogen B.

3. Rudolf the red-nosed reindeer. “Ridiculous, stupid, childish and has no meaning” – Jack W.

4. Rockin’ around the Christmas tree. Very repetitive.

5. Frosty the Snowman. “Just annoying” – Jack W.

“The Monster of Worcester”: The Real Friday the 13th Killer

How many of us here in Worcester are familiar with the horrific child murders of 1973? Here’s how this grisly tale unfolded…

David McGreavy’s father was a sergeant in the British Army. McGreavy left school and joined the Royal Navy but was dismissed in August 1971, after being court-martialed for starting a fire which destroyed a mess wardroom. His fiancée broke up with him and he was sacked from several jobs. Fed up with his lack of work and heavy drinking, his parents forced him to move out.

He started boarding with his friend Clive Ralph and wife Elsie, who had 2 small children and a third child on the way. They lived in Gilliam Street in the Rainbow Hill district of Worcester. McGreavy often acted as a babysitter for the Ralph children. At the time everyone knew him as someone who loved children. According to Elsie, he would frequently play with her children and acted ‘like a father’ to them.

Then came Friday 13th April 1973.

Gilliam Street, Worcester

McGreavy, who was a habitual drinker with a violent temper when intoxicated, had been to the pub earlier in the evening. Some time between 10:15 and 11:15pm, he became infuriated with the Ralph children, beginning with the baby, Samantha, who had been crying for her bottle and ended up killing all of them. Eight-month-old Samantha died from a skull fracture, 2 year old Dawn had her throat slit, and 4 year old Paul was strangled. After killing the three children, he mutilated their bodies further, before impaling the three bodies on a neighbour’s fence. He then left the home and was arrested by police at 3:50am.

McGreavy was sentenced to multiple life terms with minimums of 20 years. He spent most of his 45 years in prison in protected conditions. He was reported to have successfully adjusted, accepting rehabilitation and taking up painting.

In 2006, McGreavy once again became headline news after he was transferred to an open prison and allowed to stay in a bail hostel in Liverpool. In December 2018, following a parole hearing, the report said he had ‘changed considerably’ over the last 45 years and legally cleared him for release on parole. He was banned from returning to Worcester.

A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said:

We understand that this will be extremely distressing for the family of David McGreavy’s victims and our thoughts remain with them. Like all life sentence prisoners released by the independent Parole Board, David McGreavy will be on licence for the rest of his life and subject to strict conditions – and faces a return to prison if he fails to comply.

 

Lewis Capaldi could be a Greggs worker, he just doesn’t know it yet

Lewis Capaldi in his alternative job

So what exactly is the Twitter madness from people in the arts about? The #notlowskilled #savethearts #MoreThanViable tags that are going round social media were especially noticeable on the evening of Wednesday 7th October when performers from all over the country posted photos and videos of them performing due to the chancellor’s suggestion — perhaps slightly misreported — that they should retrain into another profession.

Here are some ideas as to what jobs famous people working in the arts would do if they were forced to retrain:

  • Harry Styles – Florist (Harry Styles has said that if he was not a singer, he would probably be a florist).
  • David Tennant – Mechanic (because of Doctor Who, I feel Tennant would enjoy using his “sonic screwdriver” in real life).
  • Ed Sheeran – Driving instructor (Ed Sheeran is driving in his song “Castle on the Hill,” so it seems fitting).
  • Michael Ball – Singing waiter (due to Michael Ball’s musical theatre background, he would probably enjoy entertaining people while they eat).

The Show Must Go On

Malvern Theatres

Lockdown has had a huge impact on the arts industry and theatres. Theatres have lost thousands, if not millions of pounds due to being forced to close and performers have been without any income for months. This has left many unable to get another job, or having to take on jobs which they do not enjoy.

Yes, some shows are re-opening now, such as Six, Everybody’s Talking About Jamie, and The Play That Goes Wrong, but these are all big, West End productions which are able to accommodate for social distancing. Smaller, more local theatres are less able to do this as opening with social distancing would mean that they would not get enough revenue. This had caused many theatres to have to close already, and many more are nearly at breaking point.

The King’s Speech contacted Worcester Live, who run the Swan Theatre and Huntington Hall. They responded by saying that, “Covid-19 has had a devastating effect on the theatre and entertainment industry and the Swan Theatre and Huntingdon Hall are definitely feeling the effects of the pandemic.”

They went on to say that “we have had no shows at either venue and therefore no ticket income for the last six months; to open under socially distanced conditions is very limiting when a theatre of 350 seats becomes reduced to around 90. This is simply not a financially viable operation.”

The Swan Theatre

Despite all this negative news, there are some positives. Worcester Live said, “we are thrilled to be welcoming back our youth theatre next week under Covid-secure conditions and are continually working towards future viable opportunities to bring live theatre and entertainment back to Worcester.”